Sunday, April 14, 2019

The development budget

Government spending on economic development is likely to take another hit next year as the finance ministry has indicated that the development outlay will remain the same for next year. Coming after a year of severe inflation, keeping the Public Sector Development Programme at Rs675 billion for 2019-20 equates to a real reduction in development spending. As the first item on the budget-making process for 2019-20, the news is underwhelming but not unexpected. Development spending has taken the biggest – perhaps the only hit – in these times of austerity. Already, real development spending this year has been far less than that approved in the budget. Only around Rs411 billion has been spent out of the approved Rs675 billion. The treatment of the PSDP has confirmed that the Planning Commission’s 12th Five-Year Plan is already dead before its formal launch. There has been talk, though, that the planning ministry is set to contest the proposal by proposing an increase in the PSDP to Rs1 trillion again. This would mean Rs750 billion in government spending and Rs250 billion in public-private partnerships.The future does not look bright if the size of the PSDP is to be taken into account. Only two years ago, public sector development spending exceeded Rs1 trillion, with the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor on the horizon. Putting the infrastructure for CPEC in place required significant public-sector spending, which continued to push the development budget up. However, with Pakistan barely being able to reap any of the rewards of CPEC, it would appear that the bold new future is in threat of being abandoned. If the government does not increase the PSDP, a number of projects will remain incomplete. As it stands, the government has put in an April 10 deadline to all ministries to submit approved projects. No unapproved projects will be added to the PSDP list. The issues with some of the allocations, such as the one for Diamer-Basha Dam, is that they could not be spent during the current year.While one must agree on the logic of not including projects which will eat up the limited PSDP, the need for a strong developmental agenda on the part of the state seems essential to the economic direction Pakistan has set for itself in the last decade. Under the current status quo, the Pakistani state can neither fund major road-building nor the building of major dams, both of which are key requirements for economic development and securing resources. The planning ministry is well within its rights to ask for a higher development budget. While the low developmental spending fits in with the overall strategy of economic slowdown under the current government, there are sufficient reasons to need to revisit the existing formula before the next budget.

from The News International - Editorial http://bit.ly/2G5kGS8

Related Posts:

  • Accelerating the mergerThe merger of what was formerly known as Fata with the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province has been far from smooth. The Fata Interim Governance Regulation did not give the area full rights as it granted judicial powers to deputy com… Read More
  • Harassment in the digital ageFacebook and WhatsApp, both amongst the most widely used social media apps in the country, have become new tools to be used as a means of harassment. Most of the victims are young women between 21 and 25 years and the trend i… Read More
  • Ties with TurkeyPrime Minister Imran Khan’s trip to Turkey was particularly significant as Pakistan looks to move beyond its traditional reliance on the US, and forge new alliances that will better serve our interests. In recent years, Pakis… Read More
  • FATF assessmentThe matter of the FATF grey list has moved a step forward after Pakistan finally dispatched a Terror Financing Risk Assessment Report to the international financial watchdog. A 12-member team has also been sent to attend a th… Read More
  • Rising abuseA Senate committee has been informed by the NGO Sahil that there was a 32 percent increase in cases of child sexual abuse in the first six months of 2018 as compared to the same period the previous year. The committee was als… Read More

0 comments:

Post a Comment