ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday dismissed a petition seeking disqualification of Prime Minister Imran Khan and said a fine would be imposed on similar petition if received in future.Division bench of Islamabad High Court comprising Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Mian Gul Hasan Aurangzeb resumed the hearing of the petition submitted by Hafiz Ehtesham, spokesperson of the Lal Masjid's Shuhada Foundation.The petitioner Hafiz Ehtesham alleged that the prime minister did not reveal that he had a daughter ‘Tyrian’ in his nomination papers. “He lied about his daughter that’s why he is not Sadiq and Ameen.”During the hearing, Justice Athar Minallah questioned the petitioner that had he read the Article 63(H)? Justice Athar further remarked that if he had checked Article 63(h), which deals with moral issues, and said the first principle of Islam is to keep someone’s personal life private. Therefore, private matters of any person should not be brought in the court, the judge remarked.To this, the petitioner Ehtesham argued in court Imran Khan is public officeholder and therefore his personal matters could not be considered beyond scrutiny. To this, Justice Minallah remarked Article 63(1)(h) of the Constitution, under which the petitioner had sought PM Khan's disqualification. The Article 63(1)(h) stipulates that a person convicted of a crime of "moral turpitude" and sentenced to jail for not less than two years can contest elections if five years have lapsed since his release.The judge further remarked that in Islam, it has been said that one should attempt to brush other’s private matters under the carpet. To this, the petitioner argued that yes Islam has forbidden to discuss personal lives of others but it is also written in Article 62 (1)(d) that character of member National Assembly should be according to this.To this, Justice Athar Minallah remarked that it means we should expunge Article 63 (h). He remarked, “Such petitions are only wastage of time.” Justice Minallah also warned the petitioner that if such requests were submitted in the future, the petitioner would be fined. PM Imran Khan’s counsel Dr Babar Awan was present in court. However, he did not need to present his arguments, as the court discarded the petition while hearing the petitioner.
from The News International - Top Story http://bit.ly/2CCfW4Z
Tuesday, January 22, 2019
Tyrian White case: Islam wants people’s personal lives private, says IHC
Related Posts:
Mazari seeks axing of Priyanka as UN goodwill envoyISLAMABAD: Human Rights Minister Dr Shireen M Mazari on Wednesday wrote a letter to UNICEF Executive Director Henrietta Fore seeking immediate removal of Indian actress Priyanka Chopra as the UN Goodwill Ambassador for Peace.… Read More
Flood in Chenab, Sutlej inundates 62 schools, 50 villages, damages cropsKASUR/JHANG/BUREWALA: Floodwater of rivers Sutlej and Chenab Wednesday inundated dozens of villages, 62 public schools, damaged crops and mud houses at several places in districts Kasur and Jhang.The water level in the River … Read More
Assault on Sheikh Rasheed with eggs, punches condemnedLONDON: Leaders of Awami Muslim League and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf in UK have condemned physical attack on Sheikh Rasheed Ahmed, the Railways Minister and chief of Awami Muslim League, by two officials of Pakistan People’s P… Read More
‘Selected PM’ can’t fight for Kashmir cause: BilawalSKARDU: PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari Sunday said no selected prime minister could fight for the Kashmir cause the way a democracy-friendly premier could.Addressing a press conference here, he said Prime Minister Imran … Read More
JUI-F to lock down Islamabad in October: FazlISLAMABAD: The Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman Sunday said his party activists will lock down Islamabad in October during Azadi march. Fazlur Rehman claimed that the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI… Read More
0 comments:
Post a Comment