Friday, June 14, 2019

Politics of debt

While it is no doubt a serious matter that Pakistan’s total debt went up from Rs6,000 billion in 2008 to Rs30,000 billion in 2019, it would appear that the inquiry commission being formed to look into the matter is being asked to answer the wrong set of questions. It was clear from Prime Minister Imran Khan’s midnight speech after the budget that the answer he wants is to know whose pockets the money went into. This is not the wisest question to ask about state-sector borrowing. This is also not to say that there is no corruption when the state spends money, but that the connection between state borrowing and corruption is not a straightforward one. The answer to why Pakistan’s total debt has grown so high lies in asking questions about policy, not law-enforcement. There is certainly a need to understand what went wrong.To most observers, the answer has been fairly straightforward. State spending has increased much higher than the increase in revenue collected. For those who have watched budget after budget in the last decade, the same story has been repeated. Taking on debt is the standard mechanism for governments to spend money – not just in Pakistan, but around the world. There are three additional explanations for why debt increased after 2008. One, government debt across the world increased after the 2008 financial crisis. Two, especially after signing the CPEC agreement, the government of Pakistan pursued a fairly expansive development policy, which pushed state-sector spending higher each year. Three, if debt was stable in the decade of the Musharraf rule, it was because foreign aid flowed in due to Pakistan’s role in the US war on terror. This meant the borrowing could be kept in check as the government and imported technocrats set about creating the consumption-driven economy that is at the heart of the current economic crisis. The increase in debt is a problem of policy – which is connected to the fiscal and current account deficits. How state finance works need not be studied by a commission. Instead, what needs to be asked is why we are still following the same imported policy paradigm that brought us here in the first place.

from The News International - Editorial http://bit.ly/2MMmKoT

Related Posts:

  • Gas bills’There has been immense outrage in the past week or so regarding the unbelievably huge gas bills handed to many gas consumers. This was the result of a hike in gas tariffs in October last year. Now, the PM’s Office seems to be… Read More
  • Reforming recruitmentIt has been months since the Supreme Court took up the enforcement of the rights of disabled persons in the country. The issue in front of the SC was simple enough: the enforcement of the three percent disabled job quota in g… Read More
  • A freer economyPakistan has been ranked at 32nd place among 43 countries in the Asia Pacific region on the basis of economic freedom within it. The increase by 0.6 points on the Index of Economic Freedom, an annual ranking created in 1995 b… Read More
  • Faizabad judgmentThe apex court has issued a strong verdict in the 2017 Faizabad sit-in case. The court had taken up the matter as a suo-motu case and had reserved judgment in November 2018 after hearing the attorney general of Pakistan, the … Read More
  • Typhoid alertOnce again a preventable illness emerging from Pakistan has placed international health organisations including the WHO and the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention on high alert. This comes as a form of highly antibiot… Read More

0 comments:

Post a Comment